feat: python base test coverage

[CodeYogiCo]

❤ THANKS FOR YOUR PULL REQUEST

Proposed change

Describe your change and communicate why we should accept the pull request. Links to issues are helpful too, if applicable.

Types of changes

What types of changes is this pull request introducing to this plugin? Put an x in the boxes that apply

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist

You can fill this out after creating your PR. Put an x in the boxes that apply

• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)

[github-actions]

🛡️ Patch Coverage Report

Scope: changed lines only — the code this PR adds or edits, not whole files or the repo. It answers one thing — did your tests run the code you just touched?

Diff coverage: 100% 🟢 — 63 of 63 changed instructions covered

Metric	Value
🟢 Covered instructions	63 (100%)	changed code your tests executed
🔴 Missed instructions	0 (0%)	changed code your tests never ran
📈 Tracked changed lines	63 (24%)	lines the coverage tool could measure
⚪ Untracked changed lines	201 (76%)	comments, blanks, declarations

_{Lines = the source lines you changed. Instructions = the executable units the coverage tool counts inside those lines — one line can hold several (e.g. JaCoCo bytecode), so the two counts differ.}

Coverage by file

File	Diff coverage	Covered / Missed
internal/plugin/coverage/pythoncov/report.go	🟢 100%	61 / 0
internal/plugin/runner.go	🟢 100%	2 / 0

_{2 changed file(s) with no measurable lines (config, docs, generated, or test-only) omitted.}

_{🤖 Generated by pull-request-code-coverage — coverage for changed lines only.}

[github-actions]

🛡️ Patch Coverage Report

Scope: changed lines only — the code this PR adds or edits, not whole files or the repo. It answers one thing — did your tests run the code you just touched?

Diff coverage: 96% 🟢 — 162 of 169 changed instructions covered

Metric	Value
🟢 Covered instructions	162 (96%)	changed code your tests executed
🔴 Missed instructions	7 (4%)	changed code your tests never ran
📈 Tracked changed lines	169 (29%)	lines the coverage tool could measure
⚪ Untracked changed lines	404 (71%)	comments, blanks, declarations

_{Lines = the source lines you changed. Instructions = the executable units the coverage tool counts inside those lines — one line can hold several (e.g. JaCoCo bytecode), so the two counts differ.}

Coverage by file

File	Diff coverage	Covered / Missed
internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go	🟢 93%	97 / 7
internal/plugin/coverage/pythoncov/report.go	🟢 100%	61 / 0
internal/plugin/runner.go	🟢 100%	4 / 0

_{3 changed file(s) with no measurable lines (config, docs, generated, or test-only) omitted.}

🔍 Uncovered lines (7)

--- internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go:77
				continue
--- internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go:96
		return nil, errors.Wrap(scanErr, "Failed reading lcov data")
--- internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go:97
	}
--- internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go:106
		return 0, 0, errors.Errorf("Invalid DA record %q", line)
--- internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go:107
	}
--- internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go:116
		return 0, 0, errors.Wrapf(hitsErr, "Invalid hit count in DA record %q", line)
--- internal/plugin/coverage/lcov/report.go:117
	}

_{🤖 Generated by pull-request-code-coverage — coverage for changed lines only.}